Offshore Outsourcing of Customer Relationship Management

Question: Discuss about the Offshore Outsourcing of Customer Relationship Management. Answer: Introduction Customer relationship management implies the activities of the company, which is used for setting up as well as maintaining the relationship with their clients. Outsourcing means, companies that moves towards contracting with the other company for the purpose of performing the activities that are later on conducted in the enterprise (Abbott 2008). Due to the emergence of less price, international network of communication, high speed, and network of information processing had highly enabled the rise in number of companies. It relies within the economics of industrialised market for the purpose of outsourcing the particular components of Customer relationship management for offshoring the vendors, and the same are located in the countries along with less cost of labour (Abraham and Taylor 2013). Building the insight as per scholars through the stream of many kinds of literature, this report tries to present the conceptual model, which clearly delineate the CRM consequences related to t he intensity of offshore outsourcing (Abraham and Taylor 2013). The report also offers the overview of the literature, which determinant the choice of location decision to offshore the outsourcing (Abraham and Taylor 2013). Its considered as an issue, which is closely connected with the decisions of offshore outsourcing. The increasing trend related to offshore CRM outsourcing tries to serve and even seeks to highlight the problems, which merit the managerial consideration (Abraham and Taylor 2013). In reference to this, the report also highlight the supply chain in comparison to the impact of demand side of offshore outsourcing of CRM, along with CRM offshore outsourcing compared to CRM offshoring; CRM economics of offshore outsourcing compared to CRM automation; and hierarchical CRM organization evolution in market according to business system of CRM and various other problems (Abraham and Taylor 2013). "Offshore outsourcing of Customer Relationship Management. Offshore outsourcing is rapidly becoming quite common in the international economy. Through the offshore outsourcing definition it could be explained as the act related to contracting the company from a single country to perform the functions of business within an organization (Abraham 2010). As per the offshore outsourcing proponents, it provides business with the competitive benefits in the market. Just for the sake of appreciation, that various countries hold different wage scales (Agrawal, Kishore and Rao 2008). It creates the practice of offshore outsourcing as the similar prevalence through the companies in the developed world as important, because it leads to the reduction of employment price (Agrawal, Kishore and Rao 2008). Offshore outsourcing is also highly attributed towards enhancing the offshore outsourcing is highly associated towards increasing the innovative ideas flow along with technology all across the nations (Agrawal, Kishore and Rao 2008). Its the factor that tries to positively affect the reliability and effectiveness of outsourcing companies. However, it is noted that offshore outsourcing is explored as the principal threat in the case of long-term sustainable development of American economy (Agrawal, Kishore and Rao 2008). It is first as offshore outsourcing is quite compromising in the U.S market and that too for the citizens of America (Agrawal, Kishore and Rao 2008). Outsourcing is referred as the process, in which the companies try to choice the efficient services of the third party provider in an efficient manner and manage and operate the unit of customer relationship management (Aksin and Masini 2008). CRM outsourcing activities had emerged as the highly promising solution towards fulfilling the enhanced quality demand of CRM activities along with increasing price related to it (Aksin and Masini 2008). The industry of CRM goes in the revolutionizing process along with the offerings of new services like social media platforms as well as modern communication. Along with this, activities of CRM that offer the flexibility for the employees and clients are highly posed towards generating high opportunity of revenue (Aksin and Masini 2008). In a few years back, the CRM outsourcing trend had increasingly grown between the large size companies and later on it further expected towards attracting a huge number of medium sized businesses in coming years . In particular cases of outsourcing, the complete management system, and information technology is outsourced, where else in other situations, only the first services of application like billing system, CRM, as well as Enterprise Risk management is outsourced (Aksin and Masini 2008). Increased price related to in-house customer support is considered as the key driving factor in the case of outsourcing of customer relationship management activities (Aksin and Masini 2008). The requirement of CRM services in the starting stages, which are highly driven by the technical services and product sales; however, with the time rise in the cost of the management and customer support leads towards the increase in CRM outsourcing adoption (Anderson, Fornell and Rust 2008). Along with this, follow sun provisioning services could be undertaken through the CRM outsourcing activities (Aksin and Masini 2008). It offers the customers in the firm, having no delay of time and services of high quality. The process of CRM is outsourcing slowly results in the less staff turnover that permits the company towards emphasizing the core offerings development (Anderson, Fornell and Rust 2008). However, the cost of high training relates to the customer agent and CRM outsourcing cultural variation, which inhibit the CRM services quality, and it includes certain factors, which hinder the growth of the international market of CRM outsourcing (Anderson, Fornell and Rust 2008). Social media integration outreach, along with video chatting, media channels, and applications of the mobile phone is expected to the upcoming key CRM development phase (Anderson, Fornell and Rust 2008). The International market of CRM outsourcing is highly segmented according to the services, geography, and industry. As per the industry, the market for CRM outsourcing is categorized in financial, banking, telecommunication industry, institutions, hospitality and travel industry (Anderson, Fornell and Rust 2008). It also includes retail industry, healthcare sector, manufacturing, government, education, insurance, retail industry as well as utility sector. BFSI as well as retail are few industries, which hold the key market share in the market of CRM outsourcing (Anderson, Fornell and Rust 2008). Furthermore, according to the services, the CRM outsourcing market is divided into the services of telemarketing such as inbound sales, outbound sales activities, up-sell, and cross-sell (Deshpande, Farley and Webster 2011). It also includes services of order management such as subscription services, booking taking, activation of accounts, and cancellations (Anderson, Fornell and Rust 2008). It also includes customer services such as billing management and necessary inquiries; and services of technical support such as remote resolution, services of equipment installation, software usage and troubleshooting (Anderson, Fornell and Rust 2008). Asia-Pacific is considered as the rapidly increasing geography in the context of market share and revenue for the market of CRM outsourcing (Dardan, Stylianou and Kumar 2008). Both India and Philippines are referred as the main destinations of call centers; however, the offshore places are getting huge, which also includes regions like Latin America and Eastern Europe (Anderson, Fornell and Rust 2008). The industry of CRM is moving in the revolutionizing process, and consider itself as the service offering, including social media as well as various other platforms of modern communications that are unfolding along with that it also enables the flexibility for the employees and clients, which generate the high opportunity of revenue (Anderson and Gatignon 2009). It might take many years, in which new possibilities tries to create the necessary growth, but at the same time it tries to make clear that just like various other industries, CRM providers try to adapt to present type of communication or either explore themselves as becoming extinct just like the previous predecessors (Ang and Straub 2008). It is noted that CRM had to start growing capability of bedrock for various firms. In the world of customer focused, the management of customer relationship tries to build the loyalty and even strengthen the brands (Ang and Straub 2008). Excellent services for customers has usually depicted the variation among the satisfied clients who tries to promote the brand of the company and angry clients who vow towards purchasing from the firm. Interaction of call centre is often cited in explaining the customer service and mainly when the businesses make use of outsourcing of call centre (Bain 2011). But the several of CRM fact, particularly the call centre operations that are labour intensive could go challenging towards designing, delivering and implementing the outsourcers of industry (Bergen, Dutta and Walker 2012). For the companies ensuring the ability, the decisions related to whether and what should be outsourced is quite challenging (Contractor, Kumar, Kundu and Pederson 2010). In best situations, the CRM outsourcing work better and even help in saving money, but it is true that not all cases work optimally (Bergen, Dutta and Walker 2012). Kate Leggett, who was the Forrester research analyst in Cambridge, cited in this report, which depicts implementation of CRM in most of the companies, which also includes customer contact centre outsourcing, either through application and its considered at around 20% in more than 500 companies (Bergen, Dutta and Walker 2012). It is mentioned by the author that outsourcing might not always help in saving the money and could need the expected attention of management (Bergen, Dutta and Walker 2012). Few concerns and various other concerns are considered by Peter Perera, as well as experts of customer and data management, who are working at Perera Group Inc. its a consulting company, which emphasize over the client relationship management (Bhalla, Sodhi, and Son 2008). If one but the famous notion, which explicitly mentions that customer relationship management could be easily viewed from the perspective of people, technology, process, and data, then in that case probably the better place within the company to begin the confirmation about both pros and cons over customer relationship management outsourcers (Bhalla, Sodhi and Son 2008). The international competitiveness level existing between the various manufacturers as well as dynamics of customer satisfaction as well as loyalty, which clearly depicts the company should espouse the management of customer-supplier relationship in the day to day operations (Bhalla, Sodhi, and Son 2008). In such type of business environment, firms should try to make important decisions towards reducing cost and selection of suppliers (Clemons, Reddy and Row 2012). This is significant as the better providers relationship management usually directly tries to translate the enhanced productivity, effectiveness of cost, high product quality, the satisfaction of customers and customer loyalty (Bhalla, Sodhi, and Son 2008). Presently, there are fewer manufacturers, which mainly own the activities along with value chain, instead of producers, who try to integrate the process of production with the network of supply for improving the accuracy, and speed of decision making and even gain competitive benefits as compared to the various other competitors, which are connected with the networks (Bhalla, Sodhi and Son 2008). With the present condition of IT advancement, companies are mainly forced to respond towards integrating in the system of information technology, so that they can improve the previous effectiveness of operations, or either support in building new and high competitive ability, in order to remain profitable in present and complex business environment (Bhalla, Sodhi, and Son 2008). Bolton (2008) mentions that management of large suppliers and purchasers relationship among distinct entities of supply chain exist as the constant concern for most of the firms (Bolton 2008). The technological advancement has lead towards creating a whole and different relationships, which tries to exert direct impact over the core competencies of the company as well as competitive benefits (Business Week 2010). The non-core relegation activities towards outsourcing of businesses concentrate on the core skills that were exploited by various companies that even adds value and attain a reduction in the supply of base price (Business Week 2010). Customer relationship management also enables the companies to undertake as well as efficient translations, serve, acquire and try to retain large clients, and it even empowers customers towards engaging in the companys fruitful communication and even work towards improving the delivery of all the personalized products and services (Business Week 2010). All the customer relationship management support in attaining satisfaction of clients, and even help in customer trust, and even support in retaining the loyalty of customers (Busines s Week 2010). Through the rising profits of products per unit, firms should work towards adopting the various ways related to maintaining the margin of profit, but rising products quality (Buzzell and Gale 2009). Its only with the help of this mechanism that it can be viewed that manufacturers might be able to work towards strengthening the companys core competencies (Dickson, Hunter, Lassar and Root 2015). The increase in product quality needs that the manufacturers should emphasize over resources for not building core competencies as well as relegating the non-core competencies, but at the same time, it also develop the collaborative purchaser and supplier relationship with the help of outsourcing (Bharadwaj, Varadarajan and Fahy 2009). In this context, connection tries to transform the manufacturing companies in the organization, which focuses on customers that consistently gather the orders of customers and needs before working over subcontracting the orders to a great price suppliers, to achi eve the entire satisfaction of clients (Bharadwaj, Varadarajan and Fahy 2009). In the UK, the company Toyota Production System is highly hailed and explained as the classic example related to CRM and SRM integrated system (Bharadwaj, Varadarajan and Fahy 2009). After adopting the technique of Just in time management as well as integrating the total quality management along with demand signal management (Bharadwaj, Varadarajan and Fahy 2009). Through depending on the suppliers for providing the components of high quality of complete items, Toyota had worked towards maintaining the international competitiveness of the market, despite the increasing competition in the industry of automobile (Bharadwaj, Varadarajan and Fahy 2009). About this, the production system of Toyota usually leaned towards supply paradigm and lean production, by establishing the development stages of strategies for outsourcing, modularization as well as supply chain disintegration (Bharadwaj, Varadarajan and Fahy 2009). Through working towards non-core competencies, Toyota is highly successful in enhancing the product value, minimizing waste, improving customer base, loyalty, satisfaction and increasing profit margin by improving sales and implementing the program of cost reduction (Bharadwaj, Varadarajan and Fahy 2009). There are enough facts, which clearly recommend that the supply chain management modification and the rise infamous supplier relationship management had highly leads towards the growth in electronic procurement utilization (Chan and Chung 2012). More firms are working towards outsourcing the functions as compared to a previous time (DiMaggio and Powell 2008). Moreover, provided with the age-old challenges related to the weighted distribution of various attributes, the system of supplier chain management offer both purchaser with the opportunity to clearly measure the performance and value of services, which were provided by the selected providers (Chan and Chung 2012). Again, supplier relationship management has enhanced the vertical particular CRM application use (Doh, Bunyaratavej and Hahn 2009). The present trends of higher, as well as deeper integration, will continue in coming time (Chan and Chung 2012). On the other side, the current satisfaction level with the supplier relationship management infrastructure fails in implying that all the changes might not be taken in future time (Chan and Chung 2012). As per IDC Executive Brief, firms will start and foster towards slow and smooth integration through enhancing the supplier assessment process as the way towards avoiding the significant suppliers alienation (Chan and Chung 2012). Again, there is the likelihood that the existing infrastructural framework of supplier relationship management might get duplicated; therefore, it might delete the gains attained so far (Chan and Chung 2012). To avoid this, firms might take a decision over exploiting the present opportunities through the modular and networked nature of the supplier relationship management through working over customizing the systems for reducing whatever work is done so far (Chan and Chung 2012). Redundant last implemented applications might get uninstalled or either replaced with the help of alternative components (Economist 2010). By providing the organization nature, it might hurdle towards undermining the supplier relationship management effectiveness; companies buy-in might be used as the novel approach for the purpose of fostering the connecting the purchasers and providers (Chan and Chung 2012). Conclusion It can be easily summarized that most of the corporate managers will consistently work over evaluating the vertical integration as well as self-sufficiency concept. More significant is that, outsourcing will rapidly become one of the highest critical approaches in a case of leveraging. The new technologies influx will try to push more and more organizations towards outsourcing, no in the event of their information technology functions, but also try to push the human resources. All this depicts that the coming period will hold more and more contracts, which are performance driven, trusted supplier relationship as well as partnership alliances. It is evident that the successful customer relationship management integration is the one, which helps in directly translating the enhanced productivity, cost effectiveness, products of high quality, profitability, the satisfaction of customers and customer loyalty. References Abbott, A. 2008. The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar Abraham, K. G. 2010. Restructuring the employment relationship. In K. G. Abraham R. B. McKersie (Eds.), New developments in labor market: toward a new institutional paradigm (pp. 85119). Cambridge: MIT Press. Abraham, K. G., and Taylor, S. K. 2013. Firms use of outside contractors: Theory and evidence. NBER Working Paper. Cambridge: MA. Agrawal, M., Kishore, R., and Rao, H. R. 2008. Market reactions to e-business outsourcing announcements: an event study. Information Management, 43(10), pp. 861873. Aksin, Z. O., and Masini, A. 2008. Effective strategies for internal outsourcing and offshoring of business services: an empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 26, pp. 239256 Anderson, E., and Gatignon, H. 2009. Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(9), pp. 126. Anderson. E. W., Fornell, C., and Rust, R. T. 2008. Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: differences between goods and services. Marketing Science, 16(2), pp. 129145 Ang, S., and Straub, D. W. 2008. Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: a study of the US banking industry. MIS Quarterly, 22(12), pp. 535552. Bain, J. S. 2011. Barriers to new competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bergen, M., Dutta, S., and Walker, O. C., Jr. 2012. Agency relationships in marketing: a review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories. Journal of Marketing, 56(7), pp. 124. Bhalla, A., Sodhi, M. S., and Son, B. G. 2008. Is More IT offshoring better? An exploratory study of western companies offshoring to South East Asia. Journal of Operations Management, 26(2), pp. 322335. Bharadwaj, S. G., Varadarajan, R., and Fahy, J. 2009. Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: a conceptual model and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 57(10), pp. 8399. Bolton, R. 2008. Dynamic model of the duration of the customers relationship with a continuous service provider. Marketing Science, 17, pp. 4566. Business Week. 2010. Look whos going offshore? Sage. Buzzell, R. D. and Gale, B. T. 2009. The PIMS principles: Linking strategy to performance. Free Press Chan, M. F., and Chung, W. W. 2012. A framework to develop an information enterprise portal for contract manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 75(1), pp. 113126. Clemons, E., Reddy, S. P., and Row, M. C. 2012. The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: the move to the middle hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, pp. 936. Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., Kundu, S. K., and Pederson, T. 2010. Reconceptualizing the firm in a world of outsourcing and offshoring: the organizational and geographical relocation of high-value company functions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), pp. 14171433. Dardan, S., Stylianou, A., and Kumar, R. 2008. The impact of customer-related IT investments on customer satisfaction and shareholder returns. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47, pp. 100111. Deshpande, R., Farley, J. U., and Webster, F. E., Jr. 2011. Corporate culture customer orientation and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), p. 338. Dickson, P., Hunter, G., Lassar, W., and Root, P. 2015. Customer relationship organization. Working Paper. Department of Marketing, Florida International University. DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. 2008. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational behavior. American Sociological Review, 48(4), pp. 147160. Doh, J. P., Bunyaratavej, K., and Hahn, E. D. 2009. Separable but not equal: the location determinants of discrete services offshoring activities. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, pp. 926943. Economist. 2010. Fashion victim. Sage.